Comment Period: June 26 – July 13, 2026

We value stakeholder input and invite stakeholders to provide their feedback on the materials presented on Large Load Integration Phase 2A: Bring Your Own Generation (BYOG) Process via the following stakeholder feedback form by July 13, at 4:00 p.m. MT. Please be as specific as possible with your responses. Thank you for your input.

Purpose

Following our session on June 24, we are inviting written comments from stakeholders that will inform the final design of the BYOG Process, targeted to be rolled out in August 2026.

When providing feedback, stakeholders are encouraged to be constructive and provide alternatives and solutions to the parts of the process that they disagree with. Please note that the feedback is limited to the AESO’s proposal, as presented, and the Proposed BYOG Process posted with this feedback form.

Instructions

1. This feedback is open to all industry stakeholders.

2. Please fill out the sections below as indicated.

3. Only one completed feedback form will be accepted per organization.

4. To upload your completed feedback form:

• You will need to be registered and signed in on the AESO Engage platform; and
• You will need to be on the PROJECT page (link to AESO Engage), which can be found on the AESO website at www.aeso.ca and follow the path: AESO Engage (found on very top navigation bar) > Hub > Project; and
• Click on the "Submit Stakeholder Feedback" box below to upload your completed feedback form.

All responses are due by July 13, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. MT. and will be shared on AESO Engage in their original format. If you have any questions, please email stakeholder.relations@aeso.ca

Questions

Load Applicability and Generator Qualifications

1. Do you agree with the type and size of loads that the BYOG process will apply to? If not, please explain what loads you feel the BYOG process should or shouldn’t apply to, and why.

2. Do you agree with the generation types that qualify for BYOG? If not, please explain what other generation or other supply types you feel the BYOG process should apply to, and how those generation or supply types would meet the goals of BYOG.

3. Do you agree with the ratio for generation to load required for BYOG? If not, please provide an alternative and explain the methodology behind it.

4. The Data Centre Regulation includes provisions for underutilized facilities. Please provide your feedback on underutilized facilities in relation to the BYOG process.

a) How would you define an underutilized facility for the purpose of BYOG?

b) Should the proposed BYOG process apply to underutilized facilities?

5. Please provide any other comments you have about load applicability, generator qualifications, or the tethering ratio for the BYOG process.

Project Readiness

6. Do you agree with the proposed terms and conditions for tethering? If not, please identify any terms you would suggest adding or removing, along with rationale.

7. Do you agree with the approach taken on the BYOG checklist? If not, please explain what changes you would make, the rationale for those changes, and how they would support the goals of project readiness. Please categorize your changes under headings, like the following:

a) Changes to the mandatory items

b) Changes to the scored items

c) Changes to scoring requirements or approach

8. Do you agree with the proposed fees and security requirements for the BYOG process? If not, please provide recommended alternatives and explain how they would support the goals of project readiness.

9. Please provide any other comments you have about project readiness in the BYOG process.

Execution

10. Do you agree with the length of the intake window? If not, please explain how long the intake should be and why.

11. Do you agree with the approach to studies for the BYOG process, including decision points and off ramps? If not, please recommend alternative approaches and explain the rationale for each.

12. The AESO has proposed that available system capacity for an area is pro rata split when multiple projects are locating in that area and there is a need for system development.

a) Do you agree that pro rata is an appropriate way to allocate available capacity? Please explain why or why not.

b) Should the AESO instead implement a tie-breaker approach to allocating available capacity? If yes, please provide suggestions on what suitable tie breakers would be and why.

c) Please provide any other recommendations for how the AESO should allocated limited system capacity in an area when multiple projects apply.

13. Please provide any other comments you have about execution of the BYOG process.

Bridging Option

14. Do you agree with the 1600 MW bridging limit and the methodology used to determine that limit? If not, please explain how you would arrive at a limit for bridging and why.

15. Do you agree with the approach for allocating the bridging limit? If not, please provide an alternative allocation methodology and rationale.

16. Do you agree with the progress milestones required to apply for and retain a bridging allocation? If not, please provide alternate milestones or an alternate approach to progress checkpoints, with rationale.

17. Please provide any other comments you have about the bridging option in the BYOG process.

Overall BYOG Process

18. Are there any other comments on the BYOG process that you would like to provide for the AESO’s consideration?