Skip to content
project banner

Stakeholder Feedback | TOP-001-AB-6 and FAC-014-AB-3 Standard | May 16 - June 6, 2025

Purpose

On May 16, 2025, the AESO provided a stakeholder survey seeking additional input on the draft TPL and SOL Standards.

The AESO has provided written responses to all stakeholder comments received, revised the draft TPL and SOL Standards in response to stakeholder feedback, and is seeking a final round of stakeholder comments.

On May 27 the AESO extended the feedback deadline for the Proposed TOP-001-AB-6, Transmission Operations Standard from May 30 to June 6, 2025.

On May 30, the AESO added questions to the stakeholder survey relating to proposed FAC-014-AB-3, Establish and Communicate System Operation Limits, which had previously been inadvertently omitted.

The AESO values stakeholder feedback and invites all interested stakeholders to provide their comments via the Stakeholder Feedback Survey on or before June 6, 2025.

For additional information, please see the Extension of Comment Deadline - TOP Standard letter.

Instructions

  1. To submit your feedback, you will need to be registered and signed in on the AESO Engage platform.
  2. Please click on the "Complete Stakeholder Feedback" box below to provide your specific comments.
  3. Please submit one Stakeholder Feedback per organization.
  4. Stakeholder Feedback results will be posted on AESO Engage, in their original state.
  5. Responses due on or before June 6, 2025.

Stakeholder Questions:

  1. Do you have any questions, comments, or concerns related to the proposed new TOP-001-AB-6,Transmission Operations (“TOP-001-AB-6”)? If so, please elaborate.
  2. Do you have any questions, comments, or concerns related to the draft proposed new AESO Information Document ID #2025-002, Transmission Operations (“ID#2025-002”)? If so, please elaborate.
  3. Do you agree that the proposed new FAC-014-AB-3, Establish and Communicate System Operation Limits (“FAC-014-AB-3”) supports the public interestIf not, why?
  4. Do you agree that the proposed new FAC-014-AB-3 is not technically deficientIf not, why?