Request for Feedback | June 20, 2023 RSDG Session

The AESO values stakeholder input and invites all interested stakeholders to provide their feedback on the June 2023 RSDG Session via the following Stakeholder Feedback survey on or before July 18, 2023. Please be as specific as possible with your responses. Thank you for your input.

Instructions

1. To submit your feedback, you will need to be registered and signed in on the AESO Engage platform.
2. Please click on the "Complete Stakeholder Feedback" box below to provide your specific comments.
3. Please submit one completed Stakeholder Feedback survey per organization.
4. Stakeholder Feedback results will be posted on AESO Engage, in their original state.
5. Responses due on or before July 18, 2023

Stakeholder Feedback Questions

Questions 1 - 8 on Page 1 of the Feedback Request pertain specifically to the Alberta Risk-based Compliance Monitoring Program (ARCMP) Proposal:

1. Was any part of the ARCMP Proposal unclear? If yes, please outline which section was unclear and what was unclear.
2. Were you satisfied with the level of detail provided in the ARCMP Proposal?  If no, please indicate what details were missing.
3. Do you have any suggested changes to the approach described in the ARCMP Proposal? 
4. Has the ARCMP Proposal adequately addressed your feedback related to design of risk-based compliance monitoring program? 
5. Do you agree the approach described the ARCMP Proposal is consistent with the risk-based approach discussed as part of the November 2022 and February 2023 RSDG meetings? 
6. Do you have any other comments on the ARCMP Proposal content? 
7. Did the written ARCMP Proposal format promote understanding and ease of consumption? If not, do you have suggestions for improvement?
8. Is there another mode of communication you would have preferred the AESO use to deliver the ARCMP Proposal?

Questions 9 - 12 on Page 2 of the Feedback Request pertain specifically to the Draft Guiding Principles for Scheduling Prioritized ARS Projects:

      9. Do you agree with the development phase timelines proposed in the draft Guiding Principles for Scheduling Prioritized ARS Projects? If not, what would you prefer and why?

   10. Do you agree with the AESO’s proposed approach to implementation timelines for ARS that relate to FERC-approved reliability standards? If not, what would you prefer to see and why?

   11. Do you agree with the AESO’s proposed approach to implementation timelines for ARS that relate to reliability standards that have not been approved by FERC? If not, what would you prefer to see and why? 

  12. Do you have any other comments for the AESO on the draft Guiding Principles for Scheduling Prioritized ARS Projects?

Questions 13 & 14 on Page 3 of the Feedback Request pertain specifically to the June 2023 ARS Program Work Plan:

13. Do you have any questions or concerns related to the June 2023 Work Plan proposed dates and date ranges? If so, please provide.

14. Do you have any other feedback for the AESO on the June 2023 Work Plan?